Public opinion on climate change shows that Americans care more about the environment than elected officials, according to recently released research. One stance the public holds is the need for a ban on residential construction in flood- or fire-prone areas, according to the New York Times. The large majority of Americans, 73% to be exact, say mandatory building codes should be instituted for risky areas. Another 57% support the idea of making building in risky zones completely illegal and more than half agreed those living in dangerous areas should be paid to relocate.
But while the findings show bipartisan support, more stringent restrictions have been generally opposed by local officials, who cite the cost they would impose on the economy. “There’s a disconnect between public preference and public policy,” said Jon A. Krosnick, a professor of communication, political science and psychology at Stanford University who led the project.
As global greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, decisions about where and how to build have become increasingly important. If local governments continue to allow homes to go up in places most exposed to climate change, such as coastlines, floodplains or fire-prone wilderness, experts say, it will make generations of current and future residents more vulnerable to worsening hurricanes, floods, wildfires and other disasters.
Advertisement
Related Stories
Construction
28 States Report Construction Job Growth in April
Michigan saw the highest growth, with 4,200 construction jobs added month-over-month
Women in Construction
Commerce Department Sets Goal of Getting 1M More Women to Join Construction Industry
A new voluntary pledge aims to encourage more organizations to support women in construction
Building Materials
Latest PPI Report Shows Price Increase for Building Materials in April
Softwood lumber increased by more than 6% month-over-month, but ready-mix concrete fell for the first time in four months