Ohio Court Reforms Construction Contract to Correct “Manifest Absurdity” in Termination for Convenience Term
Constructlaw
JANUARY 18, 2023
That would be a nonsensical result because it would allow the Owner to exceed the benefit of the bargain, which is not something [BoMar] would rationally agree to. First, the trial court’s reformation of the contract to account for the “obvious” typographical error in Section 14.4.1 The appeals court affirmed the holding on two bases.
Let's personalize your content