City of Hartford to pay $10M to settle contractor termination case
Construction Dive
OCTOBER 30, 2023
The mayor of the Connecticut city said the agreement will end a seven-year legal saga over the Colorado Rockies’ Minor League ballpark.
Construction Dive
OCTOBER 30, 2023
The mayor of the Connecticut city said the agreement will end a seven-year legal saga over the Colorado Rockies’ Minor League ballpark.
Best Practices Construction Law
MAY 12, 2014
In its simplest terms, a statute of limitation is a time limit for bringing a lawsuit ( i.e. , you may have six years to file suit on a breach of contract dispute), whereas a statute of repose is the “drop-dead” date where the legal no longer exists. by the statutes of limitations or repose.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Best Practices Construction Law
MAY 9, 2016
202 (2015), the Connecticut Supreme Court concluded that a contractor was liable for liquidated damages for project delays after being terminated for convenience, even where the project owner was partially responsible for the delays. In Old Colony Construction, LLC v. Southington , 316 Conn. Expect the unexpected.
NH Construction Law
NOVEMBER 24, 2023
Similar conclusions have been reached by courts in Connecticut, R.A. of the AIA A201 General Conditions (2017), for example, provides that a demand for arbitration shall not be made “after the date when the institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on the Claim would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.”
Buisness Facilities Contributed Content
MARCH 22, 2013
Several other states are moving forward with new gun restrictions, including New Jersey, Illinois and Connecticut. Predictably, the National Rifle Association and its allies are mounting legal challenges to the new restrictions. ” Colt has called Connecticut home for over 175 years.
Best Practices Construction Law
NOVEMBER 26, 2019
31, 2019), the Superior Court of Connecticut squarely addressed this precise issue in a case involving a change order dispute between a contractor and subcontractor. In VVM Builders, LLC v. Atkins Construction Group, LLC, No. CV195021541S (Oct.
Best Practices Construction Law
APRIL 12, 2016
843 (2014), the Connecticut Supreme Court held that a Contractor’s claims against a Town for delay damages could not overcome the “no damages for delay” clause because the Town’s conduct did not constitute “active interference” within the meaning of the contract. Who’s right? In C and H Electric, Inc. Town of Bethel , 312 Conn.
Let's personalize your content