This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove Legal Remove Schedule Remove Texas Related Topics
Banking Forecasting Finance Education Transportation Insurance Environment Infrastructure Accounting Sustainability More Related Topics >
article thumbnail

No Longer in the Dark: A Primer on the Distinction between Delay and Disruption Damages in a Construction Dispute

Best Practices Construction Law

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020

Triple B Services, LLP , decided on May 26, 2016, the Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed a contractor’s claim for damages on a road expansion project. Since the County did not timely move the utilities as anticipated in the original construction plan, that schedule of work was “disrupted.” disruption distinction. The Court’s Decision.

Claims 118
Claims Compensation Contract Contractors 118
article thumbnail

Viewpoint: The Case for Neutral, Third-Party Schedulers | ENR.

ENR Construction

JULY 22, 2012

Survey Schedule. ENR Texas & Louisiana. Viewpoint: The Case for Neutral, Third-Party Schedulers. I was recently asked to participate in a debate on scheduling specifications at Stanford University. Contractors routinely ignore scheduling specifications and their own CPM schedules. Safety & Health.

Schedule 52
Schedule Viewpoint Conference Claims 52
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Legal Fallout Spreads from Trainor Glass Default | ENR.

ENR Construction

JULY 31, 2012

Survey Schedule. ENR Texas & Louisiana. Legal Fallout Spreads from Trainor Glass Default. Safety & Health. Banking & Credit Crisis. Project Delivery. Ethics & Corruption. Economic Stimulus. Associations. Washington Observer. Economic Stimulus. Product Snapshot. Interviews. People on the Move. Obituaries. Multimedia.

Legal 43
Legal FAQ News Education 43
article thumbnail

One Awesome Case Discussing The Difference Between Delay and Disruption Damages!

Best Practices Construction Law

MAY 31, 2016

Today, one of my legal alerts pointed me to one such case dealing with delay damages and disruption damages. Triple B Services, LLP , decided on May 26, 2016, the Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed a contractor’s claim for damages on a road expansion project. This is a must read! In County of Galveston v.

Claims 48
Claims Compensation Contract Contractors 48
article thumbnail

LEAN OpenJOC(TM) Job Order Contracting for Sustainable Facilities Repair, Renovation, and Minor New Construction

Job Order Contracting

AUGUST 21, 2018

The primary advantage of JOC has historically been is the flexibility permitted in ordered quantities and delivery scheduling. A public agency can place orders with one or more contractors when the actual need appears and received on-demand services from a vetted service provider. Flexibility in quantity and delivery scheduling.

Contract 100
Contract Renovating Sustainability United States 100
article thumbnail

DOT Lets States Shift $473M Unspent on Earmarks to Other Projects.

ENR Construction

AUGUST 17, 2012

Survey Schedule. ENR Texas & Louisiana. million, followed by California, Texas, New York and Pennsylvania. Safety & Health. Banking & Credit Crisis. Project Delivery. Ethics & Corruption. Economic Stimulus. Associations. Washington Observer. Economic Stimulus. Product Snapshot. Interviews. People on the Move. Obituaries.

DOT 71
DOT FAQ New York News 71
article thumbnail

Characteristics of Strategic Collaboration and Efficient Construction Project Delivery

Job Order Contracting

APRIL 30, 2022

Shorter construction schedules than planned. Journal of Legal. University of Texas at Austin, August 1989. Texas at Austin, July 1991. Texas at Austin, July 1991. Partnered project performance in Texas. Texas University at Austin. 2004; Black et al., 2000; Grajek et al., 2000; Gransberg et al.,

Construction 222
Construction Project Management Engineering Management 222
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 160,000+ professionals by signing up for our newsletter

About
Awards
About
Editions
Awards
Editions
Topics
LinkedIn Twitter
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024