Ohio Court Reforms Construction Contract to Correct “Manifest Absurdity” in Termination for Convenience Term
Constructlaw
JANUARY 18, 2023
BoMar argued that the cross-reference to Section 13.1 was a typographical error, and the parties intended to refer to Section 14.1.3, which provided that the Owner will make payments for “work executed, including reasonable overhead and profit and direct costs incurred by reason of such termination.”
Let's personalize your content